Oblio, I agree with everything you stated except, the evidence rule. Your
statement is totally inaccurate. There are hundreds and sometimes thousands
of civil evidence rules. I'm looking at a civil evidence rule book right now
in front of me. I am not a lawyer, but my daughter is! (Family pride I
guess)
Michael
http://www.pdqlink.com
> 1. Rules of evidence don't come into play unless this is a criminal
matter.
>
> 2. Your actions should be dictated by your company's privacy policy. If
> your company considers email to be a confidential, then you cannot act on
> what you read. Companies who frequently protect their email include
> hospitals and law firms.
>
> 3. If your company does not acknowledge email traveling through it's
> systems as private, you actually have an obligation, an "affirmative
duty",
> to bring this to someone's attention if it does, in your opinion, affect
> the company's reputation or operations. (If it's a fight between an
> employee and their spouse, I'd ignore it.)
>
> In response to Scott, the US Supreme Court has not passed a ruling on the
> expectation of privacy regarding email and the Internet in general.
>
> (I, too, am not a lawyer.)
>
> Oblio
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
