Nice advertisement for Declude. Thanks for proving my point. As for my sounding like this "Harry Sacks" guy, whoever that is(just re-signed up for this forum the other week), I'll just say this:
You and your friend Jim come on here and whine and insult IPSwitch and as soon as someone defends them, you try to tear them apart. You get mad when IPSwitch defends THEMSELVES, and why shouldn't they? This listserv wasn't set up for you and your buddy to use as a marketing tool. It was set up for Tech Support. I have been a fan of IPSwitch products for years and since you won't allow IPSWITCH to defend themselves, I figured I would stand up for them. I have never even HEARD of Declude before you mentioned them in this forum. I don't know if your product is good or bad. Personally, I don't really care. I use IPSwitch products. They work the first time, everytime. The installs never give me a problem, and usually by the time I find out there is a problem, IPSwitch already has fixed it. No one has EVER built a program that is 100% bugproof or served the needs of 100% of the people on the planet. So just back off. It's interesting. No one has flamed your product, which isn't a full featured mail server, but third-party add on. Even I haven't flamed your product - just your method of marketing it. yet you come on here(lately, it's been a daily occurence) and slam IPSwitch because they didn't pick you. I got an idea. If you can't place nice, take your ball and go home. Rick P.S. You were always the last kid picked in sports, weren't you? Your insecurity is showing :) > Just a comment here (I'll try to refrain from saying anything that isn't > constructive): > > Command line AV scanning is quite resource intensive, but with todays fast > CPUs, it's possible to scan over 100,000 E-mails per day on a single server > without a performance issue (on a decent server; a slower one could handle > that load but might be slower than usual). > > A service based AV product can offer better performance, if in an > architecture that is designed for performance (the internal TCP/IP traffic > of IMail AntiVirus will add extra overhead) . From the preliminary > information we have, it looks like IMail AntiVirus and Declude should be > able to handle similar loads. This will of course depend on a number of > factors (such as the specific scanner used, what options are used with it, > hard drive access, etc.). Declude Virus Pro also now offers a > "pre-scanning" feature that also helps with the performance and let you > scan more E-mail on a single server, so that it won't have to start the > virus scanner in up to about 80% of the cases where it would normally be > needed (that doesn't mean a 5x performance increase though; perhaps 2-3x). > > -Scott > --- > Declude: Anti-virus, Anti-spam and Anti-hijacking solutions for > IMail. http://www.declude.com > > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > to be removed from this list. > > An Archive of this list is available at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
