Declude catches it just fine. Any product can't handle uuencode is broken, IMO.
Decludes ban extensions function catches .com files with no problems if you choose to use it. I think Trend was the first to update their defs. I know my Declude's Trend defs were updated by 4:00am EST yesterday. I don't know of any that came through before then. Jerry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Marlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "IMail Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Who caught the latest virus before it caught their users? > Did anyone successfully stop the latest "pictures" worm with rules or > Declude or whatever? > > I have not been able to filter .com's with IMail rules, because it "catches" > everyone who puts a .com email address in their signature or puts in a link, > etc. Even Watchguard (manufacturer of our Firebox) sent out a message saying > that their SMTP proxy service did not always catch this one because it used > UU-encoding. > > Does anyone have a good rule to catch only .com attachments? Or did Declude > catch it? > > > Joseph Marlin > > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > to be removed from this list. > > An Archive of this list is available at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
