It is to slooooooow. Deleteing mail and listing sorted mail.

drasko
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Jorgenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:32 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Imail API from VB


> Drasco,
>
> I don't want to sound like a sales rep for QuickSoft (I'm not) but I think
> it might solve your problem.  I use the EasyMail com objects both in asp
> code and in vb6 code to read/send and manage email.  It's easy to use and
> works like a charm. Check them out at www.quiksoft.com.
>
> I didn't know there was an IMail API...
>
> -Gary J
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanford
> Whiteman
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 3:40 PM
> To: Drasko Markovic
> Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Imail API from VB
>
>
> Drasko,
>
> I  guarantee  that  you will have concurrency issues if you attempt to
> use  the  Imail COM objects against active mailboxes (not that I think
> it's necessarily possible to get them working in the first place). You
> will  likely  violate  thread  safety  if  you  use  the  COM  objects
> out-of-band.
>
> I  would  suggest  that  you  use  POP3,  not IMAP4, and a speedy POP3
> library  (not  COM  component,  if  you  can  avoid it) invoked from a
> compiled (not interpreted) language. I understand that you want to get
> away from the network overhead, but in the amount of time it takes you
> to  hack  away at COM, you could likely restart the project in C++ and
> come  up  with a much faster end result. And not being concerned about
> forward  compatibility,  with all respect, is a bit naive: just take a
> look  at  the  number  of patches and hotfixes to Imail 7, all of them
> absolutely  crucial for increasing system reliability, and think about
> whether  you  want to be choosing between hooking the API and having a
> server that stays up to be hooked!
>
> Again,  though,  good  luck.  I  don't think anyone here questions the
> value  of  hooking into the Imail API--but if it's going to be usable,
> Ipswitch   would   have   to   expose  and  maintain  it  with  proper
> documentation.
>
> Sandy
>
> P.S.  Just so you don't think we don't want to help and thus keep your
> discoveries   secret,   here's  your  first  problem:  the  object  is
> ImailAPI.ImailServer, not ImailAPILib.ImailServer.
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to