At 11:43 AM 2/13/02 -0500, R. Scott Perry wrote: >It sounds like you got hit by the WebShield DoS issue. You need to tell WebShield the local domain names twice, once as-is, and the other time with >a dot at the end. <<
I did this. So that is not the problem >Have you checked the spool/queue to see what messages are in there? Or, >you can check the log files to see who the E-mail is from/to, to get a >better idea of what is happening. There IS a much higher level of e-mail activity than I had ever imagined. "Spam, spam we love spam" But it is incredible that WebShield consumes so much time JUST on virus checking. At 12:01 PM 2/13/02 -0500, Robert Everland wrote: >There issue has been fixed with hotfix 4 you need to have a Mcafee service >agreement to get it though. > >30. This HotFix resolves an issue with Fully > Qualified Domain Names. Mailscan was > distinguishing between FQDN's and domain > names without a trailing dot. We do have an agreement and I thought I had the latest hotfix. But I see what I have is probably hotfix 1 We have Webshield 4.5 MR1a and some sort of thing called Webshield 4.5 Hotfix 10 dated 25 September 2001. I am wondering why I didn't see this hotfix 4 when I was trying to make sure I had the latest stuff. They don't make it easy to figure out. But how can I have a Hotfix 10 if Hotfix 4 is the latest? Why wouldn't Hotfix 4 be included in Hotfix 10? Orin R. Wells AWASCO, Inc. P. O. Box 5427 Kent, WA 98064-5427 (253) 630-5296 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
