>EULAs aside, Win2k Server should have better IMail performance than Win2k >Pro b/c the server version gives a priority benefit to background processes >(ie: Services) and the Pro/Desktop version gives a priority benefit to >foreground processes (ie: XL, Graphics). This goes way back into the >history of NT3.x and goes to the heart of what the two products were meant >to do.
MS has removed the priority setting in XP workstation ? in earlier versions, you could change, coarsely, priorities. NT4 server was a marketing smoke, differing in literally a handful of bytes at the kernel level from NT4 wkstn. This was all over the press back in 97. Len http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
