> > 1. WHY not just enter the ip's into each peer of all the peers?
>
>That *is* what you're supposed to do.
then there's no need for the X1 signature.
> > 2. But here's the High Tek solution
>
>I like your solution, but it's quite obviously going to be harder work
>for Ipswitch to implement. I think peering works just fine now without
>any real management burden, DNS overhead
a trivial UDP load compared to a peer opening a TCP session with every
other peer to find the mailbox.
Also, no need to enable the dangerous VRFY command. Just use
RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and see if it get rejected (ie, just like a spammer).
>or reserved hostnames ("peer")
arbitrary, pick the label you want.
> Except the branding would be lost.
It's a type of branding that doesn't sell very well
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
