> then there's no need for the X1 signature. That's what I've been getting at.
> a trivial UDP load compared to a peer opening a TCP session with > every other peer to find the mailbox. Maybe so. Still, why reinvent the wheel using DNS when it sets up incredibly easily using the current method? There's no way UDP is faster than shared memory. > Also, no need to enable the dangerous VRFY command. Anybody using peering intelligently knows that you don't allow external SMTP to peer servers--they're POP3 only. > RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see if it get rejected More efficient than VRFY on a two-server setup, tons more overhead with 3+. VRFY is much more scalable as your hit rate goes down. > It's a type of branding that doesn't sell very well Certainly not at the expense of the RFCs. :) Sandy Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
