oh my, then I misinterpreted what you were asking altogether... please accept my apologies.
marc > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Generating SPAM autoresponses. > > > R. Scott Perry wrote: > > > > >> Not correcting you as I feel there is an abundance of > garbage traffic > >> generated by bouncing mail for the reasons you indicate. > However it > >> has been my experience that bounces are a necessary evil when > >> implementing spam filtering . > > > > > > Then you will get blocked, and I can't feel sorry for you. :) > > When I said bounce I did not mean an actual auto-ack. I am > referring to > 55* response codes which will get back to the sender. I > should have read > up on what the OP was asking about before piping in. > > So with a Declude solution you are just accepting junk mail > and sending > it to the bit-bucket with no response whatsoever that the > mail was rejected? > > > > > The problem is that you are saying two very important -- "I > must block > > spam and not have any false positives" and "I'm happy having some > > innocent victim check for my false positives, so that I > don't have to." > > This is not the case by any means. False positives are few and far > between here but they do happen. If you do not or have never had any > false positives while blocking 100% of spam then you have a perfect > environment. > > > > John > > http://www.ispservices.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
