What are the implications of this type of behavior? Part of the RFC states that a mail server has to accept NULL senders. We've been blocked before for denying NULL senders.
-----Original Message----- From: Sean Kenworthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] question about 8.14 patch Yes that is correct. <> can't be delivered to anyone and in the past IMail would accept the message but the then bounce it later. Now it rejects the <> recipient immediately. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Ivey Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 10:13 AM To: 'IMail Listserv' Subject: [IMail Forum] question about 8.14 patch Can someone please clarify exactly what it means when it says "SMTPD32 will no longer accept <> as a valid recipient" in the release notes of the 8.14 patch? Does it mean that all emails that are sent to the server with <> as the recipient are rejected? Daniel ========================== Daniel Ivey GCR Company / GCR Online Voice: 434 - 570 - 1765 Fax: 434 - 572 - 1981 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
