65.81.91.10 is the outbound address. .11 is inbound.
Also, these are static. Should static addresses be an exception? We aren't acting shifty like dynamic addresses.
adamc
Len Conrad wrote:
I'm guessing which IP is generating the complaint, but this one is OK:
mx86# dig -x 65.81.91.11
; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> -x 65.81.91.11 ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 18889 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; QUESTION SECTION: ;11.91.81.65.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR
;; ANSWER SECTION: 11.91.81.65.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN PTR mail.robinsonmfg.com.
Len
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
