> > So you just admitted on an open publicly available forum that you are > > violating the License agreement? > > > > Symantec expects and should be paid for providing updated definitions. > > To give him the benefit of the doubt he didn't mention the state of his > Symantec licensing. > > He could have a current Symantec license allowing him to download > updated definitions.
Oh, I see, he was able to get a support License for the OEM Symantec software branded as Imail AV from some one else. (But gee, then that would mean his Imail AV did not expire.) Having a current license with Symantec for another product does not entitle the holder of the license to updates to all Symantec products that holder has or may have had. Example: (A true life one.) A client (not mine, one in Australia) who has 50 workstations and purchased Symantec Corp 7.6 for those 50 workstations. When the one year was up, they only purchased renewal for 35 workstations saying the other 15 really did not do anything and did not need it. However, they continued to update all the workstations through configurations in the admin console. They got hit with a virus outbreak (some one had disabled RTFP as it was slowing the computers down) they enlisted Symantec support to help get them started on cleanup. Some how Symantec during the configuration review found that they were updating 50 workstations but were only licensed for 35. That client ended up paying a big fine. John T eServices For You To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
