Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:06:11PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > > Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Not really. Existing servers would be a lot more efficient with a query > > > which limited to a single "folder", for sure - because they could optimise > > > it. But it's no different than an SQL query across a partitioned table. > > > It means your in-memory-state needs to be big enough to accommodate all > > > the mailboxes that might be in the regular searches, of course. > > > > Have you seen UW-IMAP's in-memory state? :-) > > Nup - I've seen Cyrus' though. It could be trimmed considerably if we > had to...
The problem is UW-IMAP is structured so it can only handle one mailbox at a time. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Dogger, Fisher, German Bight, Humber, Thames, Dover: West or southwest 4 or 5, increasing 6 for a time in Fisher. Slight or moderate, occasionally rough in Fisher. Occasional rain or showers. Moderate or good. _______________________________________________ imap5 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5
