imap5  

Messages by Date

• 2018/11/08 [imap5] IMAP4rev2 questions and final editing round happening over in EXTRA working group Bron Gondwana
• 2017/06/22 [imap5] Ability to manage rejected messages Abdallah B
• 2013/04/27 [imap5] Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science johnsonhammond2
• 2013/01/06 [imap5] *Raises a glass to Mark Crispin* Dan Mahoney
• 2012/12/18 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Zoltan Ordogh
• 2012/12/13 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Barry Leiba
• 2012/12/12 [imap5] For Mark Eric Burger
• 2012/12/10 [imap5] A note for MRC and Annie Antti Louko
• 2012/11/30 [imap5] Mark Crispin Diana Colombo
• 2012/11/28 [imap5] Message for Mark Clive Dawson
• 2012/11/28 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Asheesh Laroia
• 2012/11/27 [imap5] for Mark il
• 2012/11/26 [imap5] A note for Mark Crispin Ross Finlayson
• 2012/11/26 [imap5] for Mark Tim Showalter
• 2012/11/26 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/11/25 [imap5] Mark Mabry Tyson
• 2012/11/25 [imap5] Dear Mark Björn Victor
• 2012/11/24 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Barry Leiba
• 2012/11/24 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Bob Armstrong
• 2012/11/24 [imap5] Mr. Crispin Nicole Peaks
• 2012/11/22 Re: [imap5] [imapext] News about Mark Crispin Joseph Yee
• 2012/11/21 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin TC Rindfleisch
• 2012/11/21 [imap5] for Mark Lawrence Greenfield
• 2012/11/21 Re: [imap5] [imapext] News about Mark Crispin Dave Crocker
• 2012/11/21 [imap5] Note for Mark Alexey Melnikov
• 2012/11/21 Re: [imap5] [Alpine-info] FYI: News about Mark Crispin (fwd) M.Ross
• 2012/11/21 [imap5] A personal note for MRC Bill Yeager
• 2012/11/21 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Ken Murchison
• 2012/11/20 [imap5] For Mark Harald Alvestrand
• 2012/11/20 [imap5] For Mark Dan Mahoney, System Admin
• 2012/11/20 [imap5] Note for Mark Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik
• 2012/11/20 Re: [imap5] [imapext] News about Mark Crispin Tony Hansen
• 2012/11/20 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Pete Maclean
• 2012/11/20 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Rob Austein
• 2012/11/20 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Timo Sirainen
• 2012/11/20 Re: [imap5] [imapext] News about Mark Crispin Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2012/11/20 Re: [imap5] [imapext] News about Mark Crispin Jan Schneider
• 2012/11/19 Re: [imap5] Best wishes Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/11/19 [imap5] Best wishes Bron Gondwana
• 2012/11/19 Re: [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Randall Gellens
• 2012/11/19 [imap5] note for mark Paul Vixie
• 2012/11/19 [imap5] News about Mark Crispin Barry Leiba
• 2012/06/12 [imap5] imapmove discussions go to <[email protected]> Barry Leiba
• 2012/06/02 Re: [imap5] Comments on draft-gulbrandsen-imap-move-01 Barry Leiba
• 2012/06/02 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/06/02 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/06/02 Re: [imap5] Comments on draft-gulbrandsen-imap-move-01 Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/06/02 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Timo Sirainen
• 2012/06/02 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/02 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Comments on draft-gulbrandsen-imap-move-01 Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] IMAPMOVE: a word about the mailing list Tony Hansen
• 2012/06/01 [imap5] IMAPMOVE: a word about the mailing list Barry Leiba
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Barry Leiba
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Timo Sirainen
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Timo Sirainen
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Jan Kundrát
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Timo Sirainen
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Comments on draft-gulbrandsen-imap-move-01 Timo Sirainen
• 2012/06/01 [imap5] ERASE command as part of MOVE Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Comments on draft-gulbrandsen-imap-move-01 Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Bron Gondwana
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Jan Kundrát
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/06/01 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Tony Hansen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Tony Hansen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Barry Leiba
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Barry Leiba
• 2012/05/31 [imap5] Comments on draft-gulbrandsen-imap-move-01 Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Barry Leiba
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Jan Kundrát
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Jan Kundrát
• 2012/05/31 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Bron Gondwana
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Jan Kundrát
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Alexey Melnikov
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Barry Leiba
• 2012/05/30 [imap5] Should unsolicited EXPUNGE responses be returned during UID MOVE? Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Alexey Melnikov
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Barry Leiba
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Bron Gondwana
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Barry Leiba
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Alexey Melnikov
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Cyrus Daboo
• 2012/05/30 Re: [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Timo Sirainen
• 2012/05/30 [imap5] Proposal for "imapmove" working group Barry Leiba
• 2012/05/10 Re: [imap5] Beep Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/10 Re: [imap5] Beep Adrien W. de Croy
• 2012/05/10 Re: [imap5] Beep Bron Gondwana
• 2012/05/10 Re: [imap5] Beep Dave Crocker
• 2012/05/10 Re: [imap5] Beep Tony Finch
• 2012/05/10 [imap5] Beep Dave Crocker
• 2012/02/24 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Dave Cridland
• 2012/02/24 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Brandon Long
• 2012/02/24 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/24 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Brandon Long
• 2012/02/24 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/02/23 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Brandon Long
• 2012/02/23 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Dave Cridland
• 2012/02/23 [imap5] broken message/rfc822 handling Brandon Long
• 2012/02/23 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Mark Crispin
• 2012/02/23 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/02/23 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Hansen
• 2012/02/23 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Jan Kundrát
• 2012/02/22 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAPRe: Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/22 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAPRe: Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/22 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Brandon Long
• 2012/02/22 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/22 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/22 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Brandon Long
• 2012/02/22 [imap5] Feature Creep - how far? Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/21 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Dave Cridland
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Dave Cridland
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Filip Navara
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Dave Cridland
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Filip Navara
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/20 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Sebastian Hagedorn
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/19 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/18 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/18 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/18 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Giovanni Panozzo
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Adrien de Croy
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Mark Crispin
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Dan White
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Bron Gondwana
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Dan White
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Tony Finch
• 2012/02/17 Re: [imap5] Feature set? - was Re: Designing a new replacement protocol for IMAP Jan Kundrát

• Earlier messages