Adrien de Croy <[email protected]> wrote: > > If there was a distinction between a control message and a data message, then > the network could know things like how to not create loops.
That's what null return paths are for. Exchange doesn't implement auto-replies properly so they don't work as they should. > It would need to be clearly defined, machine readable etc. It could be stored > and forwarded, and moved over the same transport. Already done. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: North 4 or 5. Moderate. Fair. Good. _______________________________________________ imap5 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5
