On 05/30/2012 07:20 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
Arnt's current spec does not show any * N EXPUNGE responses coming back,
so I am assuming that the client is supposed to implicitly assume the
expunges took place, which would cause a problem if they did not take
place. But that seems wrong to me - shouldn't UID MOVE cause * N EXPUNGE
to be sent for each message that was actually moved?
My FUBAR. I'll correct and repost.
(My code might actually send EXPUNGE a few instants later. I think
that's okay, so long as both server and client change their MSN maps in
sync.)
Arnt
_______________________________________________
imap5 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5
