Hi,
Some comments on the move extension draft:

- §2: what is the problem with sequence MOVE and EXPUNGE? For what it is worth Mulberry has always preferred sequence over uids when online (it uses UID commands when doing disconnected play back). That said, mapping to uids is no big deal (and should not be a big deal for any other client that might use sequence in normal operation).

- §2: "atomically" - I would prefer not to use the term "atomic" given that we are allowing partial failures (i.e., some messages might not be moved, whilst others are). So in the first paragraph I suggest changing "atomically" to "using a single command".

- §3: This needs a 3501-like "formal" definition with Arguments:, Responses:, Results: etc. It should use the same text for describing preservation of flags (see note below) and internal date. We need to decide whether the \Recent flag is set like COPY (probably should be). Also, the [TRYCREATE] behavior from COPY should be re-used. Should probably note that this command is only valid in selected state (or include a comment to that effect in the formal syntax which 3501 does for the command-select syntax element).

- §3, ¶2: "UID EXPUNGE" - need a reference to the UIDPLUS extension.

- §3, ¶4: states that \Deleted must not be set in the target mailbox. But what if the messages being moved already had \Deleted set prior to the move? Shouldn't we just state that the flag/keywords prior to the move must be set on the messages in the target mailbox?

- §3: As already mentioned, EXPUNGE responses need to be present. Might be worth pointing out that there could be a * EXPUNGE for a message not being moved, but which got expunged in another session. Actually, more complicated is the case where a message being moved was expunged in another session - presumably that message is not moved? Yet it would get reported in a * EXPUNGE, but not be part of the COPYUID set.

- §3: Might want to make it clear that * FETCH FLAGS is NOT sent if moved messages have \Deleted added as part of the "internal" server implementation of move.

- §3: Example: change "@S:" to "S:".

- §3: COPYUID response in the argument is wrong - it should have three values: destination mailbox UIDVALIDITY, set of uids from source mailbox, set of uids in destination mailbox. Current example only shows one set of uids.

- §4: whilst no one may implement it, there still ought to be a reference to the interaction with ANNOTATE. ANNOTATE §4.6 has detailed text on the interaction with COPY and something similar is needed for MOVE.

- §6: "command" is not the right syntax element to extend. I would suggest defining a uidmove element and then use that to extend the 3501 uid element:

   uidmove =  "UID MOVE" SP set SP mailbox
   uid     =/ uidmove


--
Cyrus Daboo

_______________________________________________
imap5 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5

Reply via email to