Gaël Roualland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yes, "*" is translated for 1600, so that gives the range 1601:1600. > But does that have sense ?
Sure. > (general understanding is probably that the > second sequence number must be larger or equal to the first one, but I > can't find it in the RFC). Precisely. As far as the RFC says, "1:2" and "2:1" are equivalent. It's probably best for clients to send only a:b where b > a, and for servers to handle any a:b. --Arnt
