On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Paul Jarc wrote: > Now, IIUC, if the top-level message is message/rfc822, then [TEXT] is > (the header and body of) the encapsulated message, [1] is the same, > and [1.HEADER] and [1.TEXT] are the encapsulated header and body > individually.
Yes. > If the encapsulated message itself is also > message/rfc822, then [1.TEXT] is the header and body of the > doubly-encapsulated message, and there is no way to refer to the > header and body individually. Wrong. The header of the doubly-encapsulated message is [1.1.HEADER] and the body of the doubly-encapsulated message is [1.1.TEXT]. > Somewhat related: is a client allowed to request multiple BODY[...] > parts in a single FETCH command? Does it come up in practice? E.g.: > tag FETCH 1 (BODY[1.TEXT]<17.42> BODY[2.HEADER]<42.101> BODY[3.2.1]) Yes and yes. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum.
