On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Atleast Arnt proposed this syntax:
That was Corby, I think.
Whoops, my mistake
b authenticate login (SASLIR dGVzdDg=) (SID 1234567890), which would be incompatible.
The client is not going to use it unless the server supports it.
Well, of course, but if SASL-IR is going to change, that's a problem.
No, I really don't want to change SASL-IR. If you think that the following syntax is better:
"b authenticate login dGVzdDg= (SID 1234567890)"
than I think we should use it.
I'm not as concerned about the ordering as the parens.
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski | Andrew Systems Group * Research Systems Programmer PGP:0x5CE32FCC | Cyert Hall 207 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 412.268.7456 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK---- Version: 3.12 GCS/IT/CM/PA d- s+: a-- C++++$ ULS++++$ P+++$ L+++ E W+ N(-) o? K- w-- O- M-- V-- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5+++ X- R@ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++ h+ r- y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
