On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Piotr Legiecki wrote: > What I want to do is to put work load *using* Imp4 on the mail > server (uw-imapd) which is on another machine. > > I think Horde/Imp is fine, configured OK (when I test it it is > working ok), but UW-imap is ill behaving when it sees the new Imp > setup *plus* load caused by lets say 50-100 people. So I want to > simulate those 50 people reading mails. > > The same two servers were ok before with Imp3 (but there I could > set up mail/ folder easly). So it is not the problem to handle such > traffic, the problem must be somewhere between Imp4/servers.php and > UW-Imapd. > > Removing UW-Imap is actually out of question (I'm not an admin there).
Back when we had UW-IMAP woes I used Timo Sirainen's IMAP tester: http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest Downside: This isn't "using Imp4", and there may be other practical considerations weighing against your use. (For example, I was able to set up a bunch of dummy accounts to test it against; this might not be an option for you.) Upside: it convinced me that our bottleneck wasn't "between" IMP and UW-IMAP, it was UW-IMAP. Even if you can't replace UW-IMAP yourself, you might be able to use the results to convince those other admins to do so. -- -- Paul A. Sand | You can find a complete -- University of New Hampshire | explanation of Heisenberg's -- p...@unh.edu | Uncertainty Principle on my web -- http://pubpages.unh.edu/~pas | page. Or maybe you can't. -- IMP mailing list Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: imp-unsubscr...@lists.horde.org