+1
On 10/03/2011 07:33 PM, Ali Habib wrote:
I'd say #2 as well. For me, the split between configuration and data is more
intuitive
Ali
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Alvin Marcelo<[email protected]>wrote:
#2 for me too
Alvin
On Monday, October 3, 2011, Burke Mamlin<[email protected]> wrote:
For any implementers interested in having input on a new& improved
administration screen, here are a couple mockups to consider:
Here's a mockup assuming that admins with appropriate privileges would
see options to manage types, attributes, etc. when viewing data:
http://jsfiddle.net/burke/yWPbg/embedded/result/
Here's a mockup that duplicates the Patients, Persons, Programs, etc. in
the configuration section, so, for example, managing person attributes would
be under CONFIGURATION → Persons and editing/merging persons would be under
DATA → Persons: http://jsfiddle.net/burke/Rj6mL/2/embedded/result/
@Vlad – if you don't get input beyond myself/Darius/Roger, then go ahead
and assume #2 is the way forward.
Cheers,
-Burke
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Friedman, Roger (CDC/CGH/DGHA) (CTR)<
[email protected]> wrote:
I'm with Darius. System admin, Metadata configuration, Data management
_________________
University Computing Centre - 'Professionalism, Customer Care and Technological
foresight'
_________________________________________
To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Implementers' mailing list, send an e-mail to
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-implement-l" in the body
(not the subject) of your e-mail.
[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-implement-l]
