On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> > More information isn't necessarily bad; I think it might be better to > try to refine the imported data over time if possible. > > If it hasn't been touched in years than obviously no one is doing it. bottom line it's stale data there is no interest in using it. AND it is making editing other useful data harder. If in future there is a good reason for having it, well than it can be imported again in exactly the way it will be useful. any import should be treated like this. if it's not edited and the data isn't used then it should be removed after some time. some hardliner argue it shouldn't be imported at all if it's not edited or used as guidance for edits. just for using data in rendering it can be merged in a render db. _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > talk...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list Imports@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
