Gotta agree. Privacy issues aside, I don’t think it’s appropriate to OSM.
I don’t think a full revert is necessary if we can remove the offending tags. d. On Feb 18, 2015, at 14:19, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote: > On 2/18/15 4:05 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 02/18/2015 08:07 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: >>> I noticed an import today that brings up some issues and a general >>> principle. >> Unsure if it is an import at all. Surely the addition of personal data >> would violate data protection rules in European countries. I have added >> a note to the changeset asking what this is about. If this cannot be >> cleared up then I'm leaning towards a revert on data protection grounds. >> > i don't think this kind of data belongs in OSM at all. > > richard > > -- > rwe...@averillpark.net > Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting > OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux > Java - Web Applications - Search > > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > Imports@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list Imports@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
