> Am 17.04.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > > In all cases the argument that "some barely-detectable trace archaeological > remnant remains" seems to be thin justification for a pre-held like of the > feature. The only problem with this comparison is that craters with hundreds of meters of diameter don't typically fall into the "barely-detectable" category. Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list Imports@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal: nu... Pavel Machek
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import re... Nathan Mills
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Frederik Ramm
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... olvagor
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Christoph Hormann
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... olvagor
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import re... Hans De Kryger
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal... Frederik Ramm
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import re... Michael Reichert
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Hans De Kryger
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal: nu... Frederik Ramm
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosi... Richard Welty