Brian E Carpenter wrote: ... > I believe, from personal observations, that formalizing the > procedure via RFC 3932 has actually removed most of the third > rail effect. (I recognize that some people don't like the > boilerplate notes as they appear in 3932, but that is relatively > speaking a detail.)
This goes more to a revision of 3932 than to this document: The RFC series as a whole is not solely the ownership of the IETF; John's recent document (rfc-indep-05) further validates that the series has other uses. I look forward the revision 3932 to remove any additional "IETF approved" text than is required by the basic document type (informational / BCP / experimental / standards). Joe -- ---------------------------------------- Joe Touch Sr. Network Engineer, USAF TSAT Space Segment
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ INDEPENDENT mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
