At 19:21 13/02/2007, John C Klensin wrote:
For example, IANA does not today consider the database associated
with ccTLD administrations to be a protocol parameter registry.
The ICANN/IANA/IETF RFC 2860 MoU says that ICANN is responsible for
names and numbers. So, which is the IANA database that
IANA/ICANN/IETF consider as a contry code protocol parameter registry?
This was actively discussed at the IGF today. Questions I noted:
1) can a Dynamic Coalition introduce independent Draft, or should
they be better introduced as for a Draft for information?
2) in many cases the need would rather be for BCP (in order to
maintain a unique BCP number when updating documents)
3) interoperability between ISO based documents and IANA RFC 4646 LSER.
4) common forum (in order to avoid one liaison MoU per Dynamic
Coalition and more complex relations)?
5) case of a submission documenting a non IANA registry: what should
the IANA do: implement a mirror, have a table of links, enter the
links in the IANA RFC 4646 LSER (Extension Registry meant to register
external links)?
All the best
jfc
_______________________________________________
INDEPENDENT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
