I agree with bvk-chaitanya as well. This would be an acceptable solution, if it's possible, showing that Sun indeed wants to play fair, and that it really is a project under Community control.
I should add - I really believe Ian's intentions are good, but that what he's proposing can not be well perceived. Laurent Eric Boutilier a écrit : > Yes, I agree on all counts. --Eric > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, BVK Chaitanya wrote: >> >> It seems, not everyone is with the same opinion either. I didn't see Ian >> saying Indiana will be ONLY a core distro without any GNOME/KDE etc. >> stuff (or i missed such mail) >> >> The problem as i see is, Sun _wants_ to keep OpenSolaris trademark for >> himself and still wants to push a distro on that name through community. >> This doesn't look good. Sun should donate/give that trademark to the >> OpenSolaris community first and then should push for community based >> distro on OpenSolaris name. -- / Leader de Projet & Communauté | I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bull.com / FOSUG http://guses.org | _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
