2007/6/26, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think SUNWCreq may actually be more than we want. Does anybody know > how big it and all of its dependencies is? To reinforce the "may be more than we want point", here's the graph Glynn posted: http://www.gnome.org/~gman/metacluster-cluster-mapping.png
If we are seriously thinking about making solaris more appealing to linux (and any) users, we should seriosly rethink the way we name packages. For me, any of those package names means absolutely nothing (I know SUNW because I like stock market issues, but I think this SUNW thing is also redundant and meaningless for most people). Good gravy (or bad :)) that's a lot ...
-- Un saludo, Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
