On 26/06/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Peter Tribble wrote:
> By people, what's the target audience at this stage? I think my question is
> really whether the first "release" is aimed at users, or whether there should
> be a 0.0 "release" solely for the purpose of Indiana bootstrapping?
Good question. So that raises the issue of "non-emancipated"
(non-redistributable) files. That is, should there be a 0.0 or 0.1
release that includes them in it? (I vote no, FWIW.)
And if not, wouldn't that be the main constraint here?
Non-emancipated is not the same as non-redistributable. Remember that
there are binary "blobs" that are redistributable. There are several
files right now that can be redistributed but have not been
emancipated that are very important for the basic system. (libm.so
comes to mind... I think).
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
