On Aug 6, 2007, at 4:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think for the moment that Indiana should follow this precedent since > Indiana should replace Solaris Express and eventually find its way out > in a long-term support release such as Solaris 11^H^HNext. And while > we definitely want to attact new users to OpenSolaris, we certainly > want to avoid creating new issues for existing users of the > technology.
Since the new user is not going to put the new stuff in their path, this ensures failure to capture. I have no objection to keeping things in /usr/gnu and friends ... IFF the default PATH is hacked to have them show up first. Otherwise, we're putting a ton of effort into a waste of time. If all we wanted to do is have Solaris out sooner, we have that already with Solaris Express. Keith H. Bierman [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strategic Engagement Team | AIM: kbiermank <speaking for myself, not Sun*> Copyright 2007 _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
