On 8/6/07, Keith Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Mark Phalan wrote:
> That way, Solaris.Next could still have ksh88, and usual utilities
> and etc. and users who set the right configuration option
> (systemwide, per user, whatever, defer to PSARC) would be able to
> accept Indiana interoperability nearly, but not quite transparently.
I don't understand why you want to keep ksh88 around. Could you
explain why you want to keep 20 year old and unmaintained software
around? After reading lots of community messages I think the opinion
outside Sun is that /bin/ksh and /bin/sh need to be updated ASAP.
Otherwise Indiana will not be able to compete with other open source
operating system projects such as Linux.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
| / IT consultant
===m==m=== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
