John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe we don't have to reconcile them, because they are /different/
> things. Which of the following are OpenSolaris? Duh, they all are.
> They simply have different audiences:
>
> The OpenSolaris Operating System:
> At the minimalist end, we have a "miniroot" consisting
...
> Today we have SX, SXDE, Schillix, Belinix, MartUX and Nexenta
> as examples of various targeted distros. If I have a binary
> program (say, oracle or my company's accounting package...),
> and I want to pick a distro,
> Should I /expect/ my application to just work on it?
> /Will/ it just work?
> Does the distro owner have any expectations in this regard?
> and most importantly,
> How would I tell?
More than 2 years ago, we did agreee that noone except Sun has the
right to call a distro "OpenSolaris" and that Sun shoul/would not do this.
I have no problem if Sun would start to publish something called:
"Sun OpenSolaris ...."
I have problems if this was not labelled with "Sun" as this would cause
harm to other existing OpenSolaris based distributions.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
