Al Hopper wrote:
> And I've been in favor of this project (after I recovered from the > initial shock of Ian Murdock being hired by Sun) - because it means > that people are putting money and talented developer manhours into > making OpenSolaris even better. We (as in the community) are getting > a new installer, a new packaging/distribution mechanism and an > improved patching mechanism - and thats just for starters. Who is > *not* in favor of that. How "unfair" is that!? Are you kidding - > this is *great* for OpenSolaris (the Project) and I don't care who > thinks its unfair that Sun owns the OpenSolaris trademark and wants to > associate some flavor of that name to describe a resulting > distribution which they have largely sponsored. I don't want to rain on your parade, but all those things you mentioned would have happened even if Indiana hadn't come along. Granted, they've probably happened a little faster, but they are all areas that were already being worked on. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
