>On 10/31/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 31/10/2007, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I am asking you again to back this change out. You're affecting
>> > stability, quality and backwards-compatibility of Opensolaris which
>> > are the great strengths of Opensolaris without even consulting the
>> > community. I think this is not the way how Open Source works.
>>
>> How is affecting OpenSolaris?
>
>Dave is bypassing the community, the ARC and all other conventions in
>Open Source. The convention is to discuss such fundamental changes in
>the community and wait until a consensus is reached. We did not had a
>discussion and there is no consensus.

Clearly the proper development procedures weren't followed; if a project
in opensolaris feels that it can flaunt the rules like this it should
not be part of a distribution labeled "... OpenSolaris ..."; specifically
not a canonical distribution, if there is one.

Casper
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to