On Nov 5, 2007, at 03:30, S h i v wrote: > On 11/3/07, Simon Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Nov 3, 2007, at 09:18, S h i v wrote: >>> One query I had, as per the Open Binary License, it is doesn't >>> seem to >>> be re-distributable as yet. Or did I get it wrong? I couldn't >>> distinguish between the open & closed ones about which the license >>> made a mention. >> >> It's redistributable. I have someone working on cleaning it up as it >> appears the wrong text was used in error. >> > > May I suggest a patched release of the distro atleast with this one > particular bug. > > While all other bugs can have their own correction cycles and can wait > for the next planned release, I believe this too important to be left > till the next release since till the fix this is a FUD bomb ticking.
That's up to the Indiana project but I am inclined to agree. S. _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
