Sean Sprague wrote:
> Brock,
> 
>> Ah, I believe the dupes are there because there are two .86 versions 
>> in the repo with slightly different time stamps (the string that 
>> follows 5.11-0.86). pkg search current views these as different 
>> entities, and returns each of them.
>>
>>
>> Hope that makes things clearer, 
> 
> It does, thanks. Except for why there should be different timestamped 
> versions - maybe could be .86.1 and .86.2 for the different versions?
> 
> Thanks and regards... Sean.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

We should add a -v option like pkg list has, perhaps.  In any case,
pkg list -av SUNWts reports:


: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pkg list -av SUNWts
FMRI                                                             STATE 
     UFIX
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.86:20080426T180521Z                    known 
     ----
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.86:20080422T223257Z                    known 
     u---
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T170331Z                    known 
     u---
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.75:20071114T203942Z                    known 
     u---
: [EMAIL PROTECTED];

There are indeed two versions of the build 86 pkg; we decided not
to delete the first version (which was part of release candidate 2).

In the future, republication will be more incremental, and only packages
with real changes will get multiple versions.

- Bart

-- 
Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to