I just love nano. It is so easy to learn and use. I use it a lot. I 
don't use vi because I am too lazy to remember all those tricks.

 ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._             Qingye Jiang (John)
  `6_ 6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)     Senior Manager
   (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-      Sun Developer Network, China
  _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'            Phone: +86-10-62673347
 (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-'              http://developers.sun.com.cn/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
About ME: visit http://www.qyjohn.net/, http://calendar.qyjohn.net/.
About US: visit http://wiki.gceclub.sun.com.cn/index.php/SDN_China .



Paul Harper 写道:
> First sorry about the double posting. The slow net here made it appear I had 
> not posted. (Webmaster feel free to remove the duplicate post.)
>
> I would definitely lean to nano. It basically is easy to move around in, 
> type, cut an paste without any instruction. 
>
> To get users who have never seen a cmd prompt in Windows to use Vim probably 
> just to configure their static network is a bit much.
>
> There does seem to be a divide in the OpenSolaris community between those who 
> would like wider adoption and those who want to keep it for few people in the 
> server room.
> --
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>   
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to