... inadvertently missed sending this mail to the Group. Regards.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > oh!!! > Navendu, if you are certain that it is not *C. sepiaria*, your validation > becomes more important than Rohit who is positive about it. > *C. pedunculosa* (synonym of *C. rotundifolia*) is described in FOS ... * > BUT* it is found at higher elevations. > > Any further enlightenment will help (calling both Navendu as well as > Rohit). > > Regards. > > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:21 PM, navendu page <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I am pretty certain its not sepiaria, I think its pedunculosa or C. >> rotundifolia (although leaves may not be necessarily rotund) >> >> navendu >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
