I think my flower has created a healthy discussion on egroup. Let's see what is the conclusion.
On 06/05/2009, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > ... inadvertently missed sending this mail to the Group. > Regards. > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > oh!!! > > Navendu, if you are certain that it is not C. sepiaria, your validation > becomes more important than Rohit who is positive about it. > > C. pedunculosa (synonym of C. rotundifolia) is described in FOS ... BUT it > is found at higher elevations. > > > > Any further enlightenment will help (calling both Navendu as well as > Rohit). > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:21 PM, navendu page <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I am pretty certain its not sepiaria, I think its pedunculosa or C. > rotundifolia (although leaves may not be necessarily rotund) > > > > > > navendu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Regards Rajesh Sachdev ------------------------------------------------------------ www.rajesh-sachdev.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
