If we follow, Catalogue of Life
<http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/4b1287115e04a31304e690e892926555/synonym/c3ce8b3b7764a604c71aecd189f33c29>
, *Sida cuneifolia* Roxb. is a syn. of *Sida schimperiana* Hochst. ex A.
Rich.
But POWO, treats both of them as separate as per *Sida cuneifolia* Roxb.
<http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:563622-1>
(distribution
only in India) and *Sida schimperiana* Hochst. ex A. Rich.
<http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:564207-1>
(distribution only in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda).
The Sida cuneifolia-Complex (Malvaceae) in Africa
<https://www.jstor.org/stable/4103035?seq=1> delves into the issue.
If we follow them separately, then *Sida schimperiana*
<https://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Schimper%27s%20Sida.html>Hochst.
ex A. Rich. in FOI
<https://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Schimper%27s%20Sida.html> has
to be *Sida cuneifolia
<https://efloraofindia.com/2013/10/20/sida-cuneifolia/>*
Tabish ji,
May pl. look into and correct the FOI page.
-- 
With regards,
J.M.Garg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCund9X1hg%2BLB0m67%2BmHQD-Pf6ekZT6kM-WiKGAwX%3DCxw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to