Thanks, Tabish ji. On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 21:25, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Garg ji, I think you are right here. I will make the correction. > Tabish > ------------------------------------------- > <http://www.flowersofindia.net>www.flowersofindia.net > The waterhole of flower lovers > > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 10:19 AM J.M. Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If we follow, Catalogue of Life >> <http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/details/species/id/4b1287115e04a31304e690e892926555/synonym/c3ce8b3b7764a604c71aecd189f33c29> >> , *Sida cuneifolia* Roxb. is a syn. of *Sida schimperiana* Hochst. ex A. >> Rich. >> But POWO, treats both of them as separate as per *Sida cuneifolia* Roxb. >> <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:563622-1> >> (distribution >> only in India) and *Sida schimperiana* Hochst. ex A. Rich. >> <http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:564207-1> >> (distribution only in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda). >> The Sida cuneifolia-Complex (Malvaceae) in Africa >> <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4103035?seq=1> delves into the issue. >> If we follow them separately, then *Sida schimperiana* >> <https://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Schimper%27s%20Sida.html>Hochst. >> ex A. Rich. in FOI >> <https://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Schimper%27s%20Sida.html> has >> to be *Sida cuneifolia >> <https://efloraofindia.com/2013/10/20/sida-cuneifolia/>* >> Tabish ji, >> May pl. look into and correct the FOI page. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > -- With regards, J.M.Garg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFAZqPFE9Wz7xR5rVJ1ykM0BpgHeV2FrqFnsH0SSEs4T%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
