Thanks, Singh ji,
I think the correct wording will be as below:
O. dehradunensis (syn: O. intermedia A Rich.) O.
latifolia
1. Bulbs usually clustered, stolons present 1.
Bulb solitary, stolons absent
2. Leaflet lobes truncate at apex
2. leaflet lobes rounded at apex
3. Flowers tristylous
3. Flowers semihomostylus
4. Longer filaments 4 mm long, pubescent, without
appendages, short ones hairy; leaves smaller 4. longer
stamen filaments 5-6 mm long, hairy in upper part with 1 mm long
appendages on outside; shorter filaments glabrous
5. Capsule ellipsoid, 3-8 mm.
5. Capsule cylindric 4-6 mm
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 14:34, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since two species are now treated as distinct we need to know the original
> description of O. dehradunensis to know exact differences between the two
> besides the differences in stamen filaments mentioned by me. Other
> characters mentioned by me seem to vary. I must be mentioned that Raizada
> (1976) did not describe a new species, and rather gave a new name to O.
> intermedia A. Rich., 1841 described from Cuba, a name that could not stand
> because it was given earlier by Steudel (1840; based on Biophytum
> intermedium Wight, 1839) to a different species (now synonym of Biophytum
> intermedium Wight). This is what I could find from eFlora of North America
> where both species (O. intermedia A Rich and O. latifolia) are described:
> O. dehradunensis (syn: O. intermedia A Rich.) O.
> latifolia
> 1. Bulbs usually clustered, stolons present 1.
> Bulb solitary, stolons absent
> 2. Leaflet lobes truncate at apex
> 2. leaflet lobes rounded at apex
> 3. Flowers tristylous
> 3. Flowers semihomostylus
> 4. longer stamen filaments 5-6 mm long, hairy in upper 4. Longer
> filaments 4 mm long, pubescent, without
> part with 1 mm long appendages on outside; shorter appendages,
> short ones hairy; leaves smaller
> filaments glabrous
> 5. Capsule ellipsoid, 3-8 mm.
> 5. Capsule cylindric 4-6 mm
>
> According to these criteria, only my upload from Kashmir seems to belong
> to O. latifolia
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 7:44 AM Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Distributed as Oxalis latifolia subsp. latifolia (Introduced)
>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/o/oxalidaceae/oxalis/oxalis-latifolia>
>> As O. dehradunensis and O. latifolia are now treated as distinct species
>> 1. Oxalis latifolia H.B.K: longer stamen filaments 5-6 mm long, hairy in
>> upper part with 1 mm long appendages on outside; shorter filaments glabrous
>> or sparsely hairy; leaves larger upto 5 cm long, upto 8 cm wide; flowers
>> light purple with green throat; umbela 5-20 flowered
>> 1. Oxalis dehradunensis: (syn: O. latifolia auct. plur. (non H.B.K.), O.
>> intermedia A. Rich.): Longer filaments 4 mm long, pubescent, without
>> appendages, short ones hairy; leaves smaller 1.5 cm long, 3 cm wide;
>> flowers purple violet; flowers 5-6 flowered.
>> Accordingly this plant should be Oxalis dehradunensis
>> Group discussion at
>> Flora of Chakrata: Oxalis dehradunensis from Mussoorie Chakrata Motor
>> Marg (google.com)
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/Xm0FRnWatfE>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Balkar <balkara...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sunday, September 25, 2011 at 12:11:42 PM UTC+5:30
>> Subject: Flora of Chakrata: Oxalis dehradunensis from Mussoorie Chakrata
>> Motor Marg
>> To: indiantreepix <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>
>>
>>
>> Dear All
>> Oxalis dehradunensis from Mussoorie Chakrata Motor Marg
>> Sorry for poor picture Quality. These pics were shot by my old Nikon
>> coolpix L15 Hotshot digital Camera
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>>
>> Dr Balkar Singh
>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology
>> Arya P G College, Panipat
>> Haryana-132103
>> 09416262964
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/Xm0FRnWatfE/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/0f87d146-2c16-4bf7-8ab3-38bebab2b0f3n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/0f87d146-2c16-4bf7-8ab3-38bebab2b0f3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "efloraofindia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpVz2xe95GjwrVMT%2Bnk%2BzPRiYY0W2pqB5q3XUCXmRVSSPQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAHiXKpVz2xe95GjwrVMT%2Bnk%2BzPRiYY0W2pqB5q3XUCXmRVSSPQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CA%2BiuSFCN0ApfcR%3DRjB_1Y%3D_OciUwrsQ2tnjOC3Q67f1FVDj_mQ%40mail.gmail.com.
