I agree with Shrikant ji On 7 December 2010 21:12, Smita Raskar <smita.ras...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes i agree with Shrikant ....*no guesses*...key characters with family > name should be added with identification > thats very nice suggestion:)::) > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:54 PM, shrikant ingalhalikar < > le...@rediffmail.com> wrote: > >> I feel that just family name is not enough. Justification of ID and >> key characters on which the ID is based also should be given unless it >> is just a guess. Regards, Shrikant >> >> On Dec 7, 3:43 pm, Satish Phadke <drsmpha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I was thinking of the same last few months..... >> > Again it would be useful for searching the mails. >> > Dr Phadke >> > >> > On 7 December 2010 09:17, Mahadeswara <swamy.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear all, >> > > This is a request. I suggest that whenever a plant species is >> > > identified , it is better to provide the family name also. Reason >> > > being only few are taxonomy experts in the group and a vast group of >> > > members are plant lovers.- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > Smita raskar > M.Sc. (Botany) > Biology teacher > 308 Disha Residency, > Salaiwada,Sawantwadi > Phone (02363) 274153 > Mob.9422379568 > >
