Lobules are absent hence this cant be Gentiana. Depending on the size of the flower if it is more than 2cm then it could be Gentianella moorcroftiana (Wall. ex Griseb.) Airy-Shaw. Some one scolded me that I am a taxonomist hence I should not talk of a plant without author citation :( Though I dont fully agree to this, but I will try to follow this from now onwards. Pankaj
On Oct 19, 2:36 am, Nirupa Subramanyan <[email protected]> wrote: > I have just realised that I also took this photigraph near the lake where I > saw these flowers. It is a board by the min. of environment and forests > listing some of the floral species to be found there. > > I've just gone through the whole list and looked up most of them. There is a > a gentiana sp listed there - Gentianella moorcroftiana. And some of the > photographs I found online seem to indicate a similarity. Is it possible > that this is the one? > > Regards, > Nirupa > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Nidhan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Should be a Gentiana sp., though dried up by large. > > > -- > > Regards, > > > Dr. Nidhan Singh > > Department of Botany > > I.B. (PG) College > > Panipat-132103 Haryana > > Ph.: 09416371227 > > > > IMG_1230.jpg > 121KViewDownload
