I'm not completely sure, but I do think it was more than 2cms. Regards, Nirupa
On Oct 19, 5:24 am, Dr Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > Lobules are absent hence this cant be Gentiana. > Depending on the size of the flower if it is more than 2cm then it > could be Gentianella moorcroftiana (Wall. ex Griseb.) Airy-Shaw. > Some one scolded me that I am a taxonomist hence I should not talk of > a plant without author citation :( > Though I dont fully agree to this, but I will try to follow this from > now onwards. > Pankaj > > On Oct 19, 2:36 am, Nirupa Subramanyan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have just realised that I also took this photigraph near the lake where I > > saw these flowers. It is a board by the min. of environment and forests > > listing some of the floral species to be found there. > > > I've just gone through the whole list and looked up most of them. There is a > > a gentiana sp listed there - Gentianella moorcroftiana. And some of the > > photographs I found online seem to indicate a similarity. Is it possible > > that this is the one? > > > Regards, > > Nirupa > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Nidhan Singh > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Should be a Gentiana sp., though dried up by large. > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > Dr. Nidhan Singh > > > Department of Botany > > > I.B. (PG) College > > > Panipat-132103 Haryana > > > Ph.: 09416371227 > > > IMG_1230.jpg > > 121KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
