Thanks Gurcharanj ji and all members for fruitful discussion and contribution to Efloraindia.
regards Pankaj Oudhia On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks a lot Tabish > You seemed to have solved our mystery and the confusion in Flora of > Pakistan > 1. Key is perhaps Stocks pro parte, which Pakistan Flora misread to assign > to Convolvulus scindicus > 2. The species was properly described by Stapf with characters totally > dististinct from Convolvulus scindicus with distinct petiole, much larger > leaves and different habit. > 3. For now, till any new thing emerges Ipomoea sindica Stapf is a species > in its own right and not synonym of Convolvulus scindicus as wrongly > indicated by Flora of Pakistan. > > Thanks Pankaj ji for raising the issue > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am attaching the original description from Kew Bulletin, Vol. 1894, No. >> 93, pp. 344-348. >> >> - Tabish >> ------------------------------------------- >> www.flowersofindia.net >> The waterhole of flower lovers >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Thanks Satish ji, Balkar ji and Tabish ji for your inputs >>> Perhaps the original publication of Stapf (Kew Bull. 93; I.1894) would >>> solve the whole issue. Could any one get hold of it and upload here. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > >
