Thanks Satish ji efloraofindia will benefit the most if more and more members understand the value of character photography (as you have termed it). It would be much more easier for those trying to identify. Perhaps we have to abandon the concept of "flower alone is enough".
-- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Satish Phadke <drsmpha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Flower hopefully 1-1.5 cm; Perianth segments unequal. Pedicels stout(Not > filiform); Filaments not adnate wholly to perianth tube. Bracts much longer > than pedicels. Bracts long acuminate scarious( Not coriaceous) > Clearly Dipcadi ursulae. > Very good character photography! Excellent. > I like to use this term here as *Character photography* > Dr Satish Phadke > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Prashant Awale <pkaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Friends, >> >> Is this *Dipcadi ursulae*?? >> >> Regards >> Prashant >> >> -- >> >> >> >> > > -- > > > > --
