Thanks Vijayasankar ji, Gurcharan Singh ji, Satish ji. Regards Prashant
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Vijayasankar <vijay.botan...@gmail.com>wrote: > Well said Satish ji and Gurcharan ji... > 'Character photography' is the way to go... > > Regards > > Vijayasankar Raman > National Center for Natural Products Research > University of Mississippi > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thanks Satish ji >> efloraofindia will benefit the most if more and more members understand >> the value of character photography (as you have termed it). It would be >> much more easier for those trying to identify. Perhaps we have to abandon >> the concept of "flower alone is enough". >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >> Retired Associate Professor >> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Satish Phadke <drsmpha...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Flower hopefully 1-1.5 cm; Perianth segments unequal. Pedicels stout(Not >>> filiform); Filaments not adnate wholly to perianth tube. Bracts much longer >>> than pedicels. Bracts long acuminate scarious( Not coriaceous) >>> Clearly Dipcadi ursulae. >>> Very good character photography! Excellent. >>> I like to use this term here as *Character photography* >>> Dr Satish Phadke >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Prashant Awale <pkaw...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Friends, >>>> >>>> Is this *Dipcadi ursulae*?? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Prashant >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> > > --
