It was, in fact, the late Steven Collins who both endorsed his teacher Richard Gombrich’s adoption of this interpretation and familiarized his colleagues at the University of Chicago - Sheldon Pollock and others - with same.
Matthew Kapstein Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: INDOLOGY <[email protected]> on behalf of Martin Straube via INDOLOGY <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 10:36:41 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] The Buddhist term sutta See also: Konrad Klaus: Zu den buddhistischen literarischen Fachbegriffen sutta und suttanta. In: From Turfan to Ajanta. Festschrift for Dieter Schlingloff on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday. Edited by Eli Franco and Monika Zin. Lumbini 2010, p. 519-532. Martin Straube Zitat von "Lubin, Tim" <[email protected]>: > Oskar von Hinüber (1994: “Die Neun Aṅgas,” p. 132) approvingly cites > Mayrhofer’s judgment (EWA III/ 492) that the derivation from sūkta > is “entbehrlich”; he cites a long discussion of the term in > Buddhaghosa’s Atthasālinī 19.15–26 as evidence against it. > > Tim Lubin > > > From: INDOLOGY <[email protected]> on behalf of > INDOLOGY <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Andrew Ollett <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, May 10, 2021 at 3:28 PM > To: Jim Ryan <[email protected]> > Cc: INDOLOGY <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] The Buddhist term sutta > > Dear Jim, > > See Max Walleser's 1914 book, footnote on p. 4: > > https://archive.org/details/dli.granth.87981/page/4/mode/2up<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fdetails%2Fdli.granth.87981%2Fpage%2F4%2Fmode%2F2up&data=04%7C01%7Clubint%40wlu.edu%7C0333231e2b2a4612271008d913e9c5d1%7Cd1a80622a99943e58eb67873905e939e%7C1%7C0%7C637562717033304457%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=DTNhc%2Bn9b9De7mhR5NFEIwsDBzS5Mmag%2B4MyhjFm2ak%3D&reserved=0> > > K. R. Norman and Gombrich accepted this suggestion. I suppose > Pollock got it from Gombrich. > > Andrew > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:22 PM Jim Ryan via INDOLOGY > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > Dear all, > > Sheldon Pollock in The Language of the Gods in the World of Men (p. > 52) suggests that the Buddhist term “sutta” does not derive from the > Sanskrit sūtra, but rather from sūkta. Sanskrit double consonant > clusters do show regular assimilation, regressively and > progressively, in Prakrit, where two different consonants become a > double of one of them. I’m interested in hearing learned opinion on > Pollock’s suggestion. I had not noticed this interesting detail, > when I first read this book some years ago. > > James Ryan > Asian Philosophies and Cultures (Emeritus) > California Institute of Integral Studies > > _______________________________________________ > INDOLOGY mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist.indology.info%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Findology&data=04%7C01%7Clubint%40wlu.edu%7C0333231e2b2a4612271008d913e9c5d1%7Cd1a80622a99943e58eb67873905e939e%7C1%7C0%7C637562717033304457%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=QhpIMwMX1t2wttLw14Lv%2FDk9z7oS7xcXKUjwMaTv1r8%3D&reserved=0> _______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
